Sunday, November 24, 2019

Free Essays on Our Nation Torn Within

# In Chaucer’s description of the Knight, discuss whether you agree or disagree with Chaucer’s intentions to represent the ideal of Knighthood. Chaucer describes the knight as having some very real and obvious flaws such as, dishonorable behavior, and having ignoble apparel. Because Chaucer gave the Knight such imperfections, his intentions to represent the ideal Knight did not seem sensible. The reason why the Knight wanted to go on a pilgrimage was because he wanted to cleanse his spirit of dirt that many wars imposed on it. Because the knight went on the pilgrimage to cleanse his soul, chances are he didn’t have the best religious integrity. And if we use my definition of honor, not having religious integrity would lead to dishonorable behavior, which in turn leads to the idea that Chaucer created a dishonorable Knight. Instead of describing the â€Å"ideal Knight†, which would be courteous, and always in clean attire, Chaucer describes the Knight being dressed in dirty clothing. The reason for the Knight being dressed in dirty clothing was because the Knight just returned from battle. I think that Chaucer was using this stereotype to further illustrate that his Knight was not the â€Å"ideal Knight†. Chaucer says that the Knight is very courageous, very prudent, and very sage, but never once says that the Knight is honorable. Also it is no where mentioned that the Knight is kind to orphans, poor people, or even widows. These are all things that an honorable Knight should do, as part of their code of Chivalry. Chaucer describes how the Knight participated in the Crusades that were mostly centered on pillaging and looting. The Crusades were not looked at as very honorable. One of the lines in the Knight’s description states, â€Å"And almost beyond price was his prestige.† This line alludes to the fact that the Knight was a paid fighter, which puts him in the same category with mercenary. Mercenaries were... Free Essays on Our Nation Torn Within Free Essays on Our Nation Torn Within # In Chaucer’s description of the Knight, discuss whether you agree or disagree with Chaucer’s intentions to represent the ideal of Knighthood. Chaucer describes the knight as having some very real and obvious flaws such as, dishonorable behavior, and having ignoble apparel. Because Chaucer gave the Knight such imperfections, his intentions to represent the ideal Knight did not seem sensible. The reason why the Knight wanted to go on a pilgrimage was because he wanted to cleanse his spirit of dirt that many wars imposed on it. Because the knight went on the pilgrimage to cleanse his soul, chances are he didn’t have the best religious integrity. And if we use my definition of honor, not having religious integrity would lead to dishonorable behavior, which in turn leads to the idea that Chaucer created a dishonorable Knight. Instead of describing the â€Å"ideal Knight†, which would be courteous, and always in clean attire, Chaucer describes the Knight being dressed in dirty clothing. The reason for the Knight being dressed in dirty clothing was because the Knight just returned from battle. I think that Chaucer was using this stereotype to further illustrate that his Knight was not the â€Å"ideal Knight†. Chaucer says that the Knight is very courageous, very prudent, and very sage, but never once says that the Knight is honorable. Also it is no where mentioned that the Knight is kind to orphans, poor people, or even widows. These are all things that an honorable Knight should do, as part of their code of Chivalry. Chaucer describes how the Knight participated in the Crusades that were mostly centered on pillaging and looting. The Crusades were not looked at as very honorable. One of the lines in the Knight’s description states, â€Å"And almost beyond price was his prestige.† This line alludes to the fact that the Knight was a paid fighter, which puts him in the same category with mercenary. Mercenaries were...

Thursday, November 21, 2019

Drugs Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words - 1

Drugs - Essay Example In the second case, the EU also passes a (fictitious) directive on the right of all residents to high speed broadband by Jan 2014. This includes the duty to replace all existing broad band connections with modern connections to the new fibre optic system. The Directive is to be implemented by Member States by July 2013. The UK Statutory Instrument implementing the directive says that ‘all connections within private buildings will be replaced with modern connections.’ The connections are being changed by a subcontractor; Sparky Ltd. Sparky has been given a wide discretion as to how they complete the job as long as they are finished by December 2013. They are given details of all current broadband users so that they can contact them to arrange changing the connections. Martin’s small IT business leases part of a building used by the local secondary school. This is a public building. Sparky therefore refuse to replace the connections as they are only required to repl ace connections in private buildings. As a result, Martin loses business to operators who are able to offer high-speed broadband. The EU law should be able to assist both Bob and Martin. In the case of Bob, the regulation passed by the EU requiring that current copper wire network gets replaced with fibre optic cable by December 2013 is a type of EU law that is directly effective. Worth noting, however, is that the responsibility to enforce the EU regulation does not rest exclusively with the EU. EU law does not just come up with legal rights and obligations for member states; this was famously said by the Court during the Van Gend Loos case that obligations are also imposed. According to the legal system developed by the treaties of EU, a distinction is made between national and international law; the reason the system is in existence is because it was created by member states through